Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Продолжая разговор об эволюции офисного кресла, обратимся к работам дизайнеров 1930-1940-х гг. В этот период промышленность предлагала конторским работникам множество разных моделей, не отличавшихся революционными решениями в плане эргономики (да и сам этот термин еще не вошел в обиход дизайнеров). Рынок был преимущественно насыщен разнообразными вариациями кресел «Tan-Sad», аскетичными (хоть и симпатичными) стульями для машинисток (на фото 3-4 запечатлены стулья Виллема Гиспена, одно из которых подозрительно похоже на работу Шарлотты Перриан) или более традиционными креслами банковских служащих. К числу советских представителей последней категории можно отнести кабинетный стул из гарнитура «Хлеба коммунизма», спроектированного в 1937 г. для смоленского дома-коммуны Игорем Крестовским.

———

Let’s resume our discussion of the evolution of the office chair and focus on designs that were available in the 1930-1940s. The choice of office chair designs was quite diverse, but most of them failed to offer any revolutionary value in terms of their ergonomics (the term itself was not commonly used then in the design community). Offices were generally equipped with Tan-Sad’s chairs or their copycats, spartan but aesthetically pleasing typist chairs (pictures 3 and 4 show designs by Willem Gispen one of which is nearly identical to Perriand’s chair mentioned earlier), and more traditional-looking banker’s chairs. The last pictures in this selection show a Soviet variation of the latter created by Igor Krestovsky in 1937 as part of a furniture suite titled “The Harvest of Communism” he designed for what was referred to as “a house-commune” in Smolensk.

(photos here and below: jacksons.se, s16home.com, projectvintage.co.uk, artcurial.com, sonneveldhouse.com, thejumpingfrog.com, dorsetfinds.wordpress.com, vintage-design-point.be, capitoliumart.it, drouot.com, quittenbaum.de, phillips.com, moltenimuseum.com, buro247.ru, mydecor.ru, heritage-gallery.ru)



group-telegram.com/midcenturymodern/8625
Create:
Last Update:

Продолжая разговор об эволюции офисного кресла, обратимся к работам дизайнеров 1930-1940-х гг. В этот период промышленность предлагала конторским работникам множество разных моделей, не отличавшихся революционными решениями в плане эргономики (да и сам этот термин еще не вошел в обиход дизайнеров). Рынок был преимущественно насыщен разнообразными вариациями кресел «Tan-Sad», аскетичными (хоть и симпатичными) стульями для машинисток (на фото 3-4 запечатлены стулья Виллема Гиспена, одно из которых подозрительно похоже на работу Шарлотты Перриан) или более традиционными креслами банковских служащих. К числу советских представителей последней категории можно отнести кабинетный стул из гарнитура «Хлеба коммунизма», спроектированного в 1937 г. для смоленского дома-коммуны Игорем Крестовским.

———

Let’s resume our discussion of the evolution of the office chair and focus on designs that were available in the 1930-1940s. The choice of office chair designs was quite diverse, but most of them failed to offer any revolutionary value in terms of their ergonomics (the term itself was not commonly used then in the design community). Offices were generally equipped with Tan-Sad’s chairs or their copycats, spartan but aesthetically pleasing typist chairs (pictures 3 and 4 show designs by Willem Gispen one of which is nearly identical to Perriand’s chair mentioned earlier), and more traditional-looking banker’s chairs. The last pictures in this selection show a Soviet variation of the latter created by Igor Krestovsky in 1937 as part of a furniture suite titled “The Harvest of Communism” he designed for what was referred to as “a house-commune” in Smolensk.

(photos here and below: jacksons.se, s16home.com, projectvintage.co.uk, artcurial.com, sonneveldhouse.com, thejumpingfrog.com, dorsetfinds.wordpress.com, vintage-design-point.be, capitoliumart.it, drouot.com, quittenbaum.de, phillips.com, moltenimuseum.com, buro247.ru, mydecor.ru, heritage-gallery.ru)

BY Mid-Century, More Than










Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/midcenturymodern/8625

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

As such, the SC would like to remind investors to always exercise caution when evaluating investment opportunities, especially those promising unrealistically high returns with little or no risk. Investors should also never deposit money into someone’s personal bank account if instructed. Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from us


Telegram Mid-Century, More Than
FROM American