Россия близка к достижению целей СВО, российские военные завладели стратегической инициативой на всех участках. Об этом в программном интервью журналу "Разведчик" заявил глава СВР Сергей Нарышкин. Также Директор отметил, что дальнейшая эскалация не только не приведет к истощению России, но приблизит стратегическое поражение самого Запада, а ВСУ находятся на грани развала.
Как мы неоднократно говорили, широкую общественную дискуссию "Россия после победы в СВО" надо начинать прямо сейчас.
Россия близка к достижению целей СВО, российские военные завладели стратегической инициативой на всех участках. Об этом в программном интервью журналу "Разведчик" заявил глава СВР Сергей Нарышкин. Также Директор отметил, что дальнейшая эскалация не только не приведет к истощению России, но приблизит стратегическое поражение самого Запада, а ВСУ находятся на грани развала.
Как мы неоднократно говорили, широкую общественную дискуссию "Россия после победы в СВО" надо начинать прямо сейчас.
BY МИГ России
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels.
from us