Бывшая секретарша и шофер Светланы Лады-Русь нажились на ее квартире? Иначе, как мошенничеством и бандитизмом это не назовешь. И без крыши силовых структур, по моему мнению, такие махинации не провернешь. А поскольку Светлана Лада Русь вынуждена скрываться от преследования системы за правду о предательстве верхов, давайте защищать ее сами.
Бывшая секретарша и шофер Светланы Лады-Русь нажились на ее квартире? Иначе, как мошенничеством и бандитизмом это не назовешь. И без крыши силовых структур, по моему мнению, такие махинации не провернешь. А поскольку Светлана Лада Русь вынуждена скрываться от преследования системы за правду о предательстве верхов, давайте защищать ее сами.
BY НАРОДНАЯ ТРИБУНА
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from us
