Папа Римский в критическом состоянии, ему сделали переливание крови
Папе Римскому Франциску сделали переливание крови, он находится в критическом состоянии. Отмечается, что понтифик остаётся в сознании и провел день в кресле. Прогноз по его состоянию здоровья сдержанн...
Папа Римский в критическом состоянии, ему сделали переливание крови
Папе Римскому Франциску сделали переливание крови, он находится в критическом состоянии. Отмечается, что понтифик остаётся в сознании и провел день в кресле. Прогноз по его состоянию здоровья сдержанн...
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from us
