Руслан Болотов: На многих объектах подрядчики вышли на завершающие этапы. Поручил им увеличить количество техники и людей, чтобы завершить дорожный ремонт раньше срока, предусмотренного контрактами. Во время приемки готовых участков специалисты администрации следят за тем, чтобы было восстановлено нарушенное благоустройство и газоны. Все выявленные недочеты подрядчики обязаны оперативно устранить.
Руслан Болотов: На многих объектах подрядчики вышли на завершающие этапы. Поручил им увеличить количество техники и людей, чтобы завершить дорожный ремонт раньше срока, предусмотренного контрактами. Во время приемки готовых участков специалисты администрации следят за тем, чтобы было восстановлено нарушенное благоустройство и газоны. Все выявленные недочеты подрядчики обязаны оперативно устранить.
BY Невозмутимый Иркутск
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Telegram users are able to send files of any type up to 2GB each and access them from any device, with no limit on cloud storage, which has made downloading files more popular on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from us
