🌐 Издание «Новая газета.Европа», сайт которого заблокирован на территории РФ, сообщает, что теперь их материалы публикуют на платформе Project Syndicate.
НКО Project Syndicate позиционирует себя как площадка, на которой публикуют аналитические материалы по различным глобальным темам, которые потом распространяются по сетке партнёрских изданий.
В основном, НКО предоставляет свои услуги изданиям в «развивающихся странах, где журналистские ресурсы могут быть недоступны, свобода СМИ и финансирование ограничены». Project Syndicate получал гранты от фонда Джорджа Сороса «Открытое общество», который признан в России нежелательной организацией.
📌 Как мы понимаем, такие площадки обычно используются как политический инструмент для противостояния неудобным правительствам с помощью создания враждебного информационного фона и иллюзии «открытой» информации.
#Россия #иноагенты @pezdicide никакой химии — только факты
🌐 Издание «Новая газета.Европа», сайт которого заблокирован на территории РФ, сообщает, что теперь их материалы публикуют на платформе Project Syndicate.
НКО Project Syndicate позиционирует себя как площадка, на которой публикуют аналитические материалы по различным глобальным темам, которые потом распространяются по сетке партнёрских изданий.
В основном, НКО предоставляет свои услуги изданиям в «развивающихся странах, где журналистские ресурсы могут быть недоступны, свобода СМИ и финансирование ограничены». Project Syndicate получал гранты от фонда Джорджа Сороса «Открытое общество», который признан в России нежелательной организацией.
📌 Как мы понимаем, такие площадки обычно используются как политический инструмент для противостояния неудобным правительствам с помощью создания враждебного информационного фона и иллюзии «открытой» информации.
#Россия #иноагенты @pezdicide никакой химии — только факты
BY Системный пестицид
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
