❄️ Наша очаровательная Машенька записала для вас особенное поздравление — искреннее и тёплое!❣
✨ Она уже ждёт встречи с вами в 2025 году, который принесёт нам долгожданное открытие центра. 🎭🎨🎼📚 Машенька обещает, что совсем скоро вы увидите, как здесь оживают мечты! ⛄ А пока — нажимайте «play» и начинайте новый год с улыбки. 😊
❄️ Наша очаровательная Машенька записала для вас особенное поздравление — искреннее и тёплое!❣
✨ Она уже ждёт встречи с вами в 2025 году, который принесёт нам долгожданное открытие центра. 🎭🎨🎼📚 Машенька обещает, что совсем скоро вы увидите, как здесь оживают мечты! ⛄ А пока — нажимайте «play» и начинайте новый год с улыбки. 😊
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
