Не смогла поехать в Париж (и очень зла по этому поводу) и работаю над текстом и параллельно реферирую несколько авторов. Вот цитата одного из них (книга из серии Sotheby’s Art Institute):
The majority of medium and large scale art institutions are in stagnation, fixated on their current circumstances, generating intellectually and financially cautious activities. They are not taking risks or pushing boundaries. This institutional crisis manifests itself in stale and populist programming that lacks curatorial rigour and artistic nuance, resulting in a cultural offer for everyone that is about everything and nothing in particular.
Не смогла поехать в Париж (и очень зла по этому поводу) и работаю над текстом и параллельно реферирую несколько авторов. Вот цитата одного из них (книга из серии Sotheby’s Art Institute):
The majority of medium and large scale art institutions are in stagnation, fixated on their current circumstances, generating intellectually and financially cautious activities. They are not taking risks or pushing boundaries. This institutional crisis manifests itself in stale and populist programming that lacks curatorial rigour and artistic nuance, resulting in a cultural offer for everyone that is about everything and nothing in particular.
BY Подпольникова
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK.
from us
