Твит от ADL (Антидиффамационной лиги): "До Хэллоуина осталось неделя, и вы и ваша семья можете обдумывать идеи костюмов. Ознакомьтесь с нашим ресурсом, где можно найти напоминания о том, как и почему следует избегать культурной апроприации, культурных стереотипов и костюмов, закрепляющих гендерные нормы".
Это крайне нелепый твит. Самая нелепая часть этого твита - это то, что ADL осуждает костюмы, которые «увековечивают гендерные нормы». Другими словами, они против девочек, носящих девичьи костюмы, и мальчиков, носящих мужские костюмы, что приводит нас обратно к всемогущей повестке дня по размыванию полов.
Твит от ADL (Антидиффамационной лиги): "До Хэллоуина осталось неделя, и вы и ваша семья можете обдумывать идеи костюмов. Ознакомьтесь с нашим ресурсом, где можно найти напоминания о том, как и почему следует избегать культурной апроприации, культурных стереотипов и костюмов, закрепляющих гендерные нормы".
Это крайне нелепый твит. Самая нелепая часть этого твита - это то, что ADL осуждает костюмы, которые «увековечивают гендерные нормы». Другими словами, они против девочек, носящих девичьи костюмы, и мальчиков, носящих мужские костюмы, что приводит нас обратно к всемогущей повестке дня по размыванию полов.
But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from us
