Помощник председателя правительства РФ Муслим Хучиев призвал убрать теорию Дарвина из школьных учебников, мотивируя это ее противоречием религиозному воспитанию. Он утверждает, что теория Дарвина ложна и способствует «духовному разложению»детей.
Хучиев считает, что все религии признали ложность теории Дарвина и, по его мнению, нет необходимости в дополнительных доказательствах для ее исключения из школьной программы.
Помощник председателя правительства РФ Муслим Хучиев призвал убрать теорию Дарвина из школьных учебников, мотивируя это ее противоречием религиозному воспитанию. Он утверждает, что теория Дарвина ложна и способствует «духовному разложению»детей.
Хучиев считает, что все религии признали ложность теории Дарвина и, по его мнению, нет необходимости в дополнительных доказательствах для ее исключения из школьной программы.
Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. NEWS Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
