ينبغي أن يترسخ في الناس نوع من فقه التعامل مع التريند ومثيري الجدل اللاهثين وراء الريتش والتفاعل بالحكايات السخيفة…وهذا ضرب من ضروب الوعي المتعلق بالسوشيال ميديا
ينبغي أن يترسخ في الناس نوع من فقه التعامل مع التريند ومثيري الجدل اللاهثين وراء الريتش والتفاعل بالحكايات السخيفة…وهذا ضرب من ضروب الوعي المتعلق بالسوشيال ميديا
BY سعد خضر
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from us
