😈 Бои на Курском фронте: спецназ эпично уничтожает пулемётную точку ВСУ ▪️Также разведчики группировки войск «Север» в приграничном районе Курской области с БпЛА выявили ведущую огонь огневую позицию ВСУ и ликвидировал её. ▪️Обнаруженная цель была оперативно и красиво уничтожена.
😈 Бои на Курском фронте: спецназ эпично уничтожает пулемётную точку ВСУ ▪️Также разведчики группировки войск «Север» в приграничном районе Курской области с БпЛА выявили ведущую огонь огневую позицию ВСУ и ликвидировал её. ▪️Обнаруженная цель была оперативно и красиво уничтожена.
"And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from us
