Ребятушки, вы сильно не докручиваете свое «зачем», судя по комментариям. Вы останавливаетесь на «что». Под одним «зачем» еще штук пять слоёв. И вот когда будет то самое важное «зачем», в мозгу зажжется лампочка и он такой «а, так вот о чем разговор!» )))
Ребятушки, вы сильно не докручиваете свое «зачем», судя по комментариям. Вы останавливаетесь на «что». Под одним «зачем» еще штук пять слоёв. И вот когда будет то самое важное «зачем», в мозгу зажжется лампочка и он такой «а, так вот о чем разговор!» )))
BY Нес(с)ущая конструкция
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts.
from us
