Краснодарский урбанист поделился мнением об участке под будущий храм на ЮМР
Общественный деятель Мирослав Валькович для @news_93_ru подробно рассмотрел предлагаемый участок и оценил, насколько он подходит для религиозного сооружения.
А где еще можно построить храм и при каких условиях? Сколько на это нужно денег? Может, есть какой-то другой подходящий участок? Обо всём — в колонке.
Краснодарский урбанист поделился мнением об участке под будущий храм на ЮМР
Общественный деятель Мирослав Валькович для @news_93_ru подробно рассмотрел предлагаемый участок и оценил, насколько он подходит для религиозного сооружения.
А где еще можно построить храм и при каких условиях? Сколько на это нужно денег? Может, есть какой-то другой подходящий участок? Обо всём — в колонке.
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world.
from us