Если бить в ответ на обстрел АТАКАМсами, то ракеты должны как минимум лететь в польский Жешув, вот это будет ответ на обстрел, можно спокойно выдавать в брифинге. А работа ракетчиков и ВКС по целям на территории Украины, это рутинная повседневная боевая работа, а не сокрушительный ответный удар, предназначенный для воспитания нерадивых.
Если бить в ответ на обстрел АТАКАМсами, то ракеты должны как минимум лететь в польский Жешув, вот это будет ответ на обстрел, можно спокойно выдавать в брифинге. А работа ракетчиков и ВКС по целям на территории Украины, это рутинная повседневная боевая работа, а не сокрушительный ответный удар, предназначенный для воспитания нерадивых.
BY Старше Эдды
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a video message on Tuesday that Ukrainian forces "destroy the invaders wherever we can." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
