Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8560 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 V Z - ВЗГЛЯД.РУ | Telegram Webview: vzglyad_ru/41403 -
«Некоторые наши недоброжелатели интерпретируют предложения России по стратегической стабильности как ультиматум с нашей стороны. Это ультиматум или нет? Конечно, нет!», — заявил Путин
«Некоторые наши недоброжелатели интерпретируют предложения России по стратегической стабильности как ультиматум с нашей стороны. Это ультиматум или нет? Конечно, нет!», — заявил Путин
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
