У зампреда "Яблока" Льва Шлосберга в Пскове прошел обыск сегодня утром. В сети распространилось видео пропагандистского медиа с места событий: в квартиру к Шлосбергу пришел СОБР. Вероятная причина - якобы нарушение закона об «иноагентах». Сейчас политик находится на допросе. С ним работает адвокат.
У зампреда "Яблока" Льва Шлосберга в Пскове прошел обыск сегодня утром. В сети распространилось видео пропагандистского медиа с места событий: в квартиру к Шлосбергу пришел СОБР. Вероятная причина - якобы нарушение закона об «иноагентах». Сейчас политик находится на допросе. С ним работает адвокат.
Подробности выясняются.
BY Пресс-служба Яблока
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns
from us
