Как по-разному восприняли программную «Валдайскую речь» Вадик Самойлов и директор «Ельцин-центра». Первый - вдохновился. Ну творческий человек, имеет право на сильную формулировку сильного чувства. Второй - даже не знаем, как оценивать такое решение в такой момент. Наверное - как показательную реакцию. Или у них в «Ельцин-центре» вечный 1991 и они новости не смотрят?
Как по-разному восприняли программную «Валдайскую речь» Вадик Самойлов и директор «Ельцин-центра». Первый - вдохновился. Ну творческий человек, имеет право на сильную формулировку сильного чувства. Второй - даже не знаем, как оценивать такое решение в такой момент. Наверное - как показательную реакцию. Или у них в «Ельцин-центре» вечный 1991 и они новости не смотрят?
BY Закулиска
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
During the operations, Sebi officials seized various records and documents, including 34 mobile phones, six laptops, four desktops, four tablets, two hard drive disks and one pen drive from the custody of these persons. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
