“Фитосанитарные” новости традиционно загоняют в тупик, ещё буквально позавчера в эквадорских бананах никакой мухи – горбатки и близко не было, а как эта страна согласилась поставить оружие Украине, её сразу нашли. В принципе ничего нового, тоже самое было в свое время с украинскими, молдавскими, грузинскими и т.д. товарами, но если молоко, сыры или вино из этих стран можно было легко заменить, то с бананами скорее всего будут проблемы, причем у нас.
“Фитосанитарные” новости традиционно загоняют в тупик, ещё буквально позавчера в эквадорских бананах никакой мухи – горбатки и близко не было, а как эта страна согласилась поставить оружие Украине, её сразу нашли. В принципе ничего нового, тоже самое было в свое время с украинскими, молдавскими, грузинскими и т.д. товарами, но если молоко, сыры или вино из этих стран можно было легко заменить, то с бананами скорее всего будут проблемы, причем у нас.
DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from us
