🫡 Орк по-позывному КАЧ передаёт привет вам товарищи! Служили вместе 100 лет назад. У него всё на 4, не хватает дрона и дронобойки. Теплак, говорит, затрофеил.
🤙 Предлагаю скинуться боевому муравью на нехватку экипировки, он реально выполняет боевые задачи (впрочем, как и все мои братулёчки). Всё, как обычно - кто сколько может. 😡Zлые Отважные Vоинственные
🫡 Орк по-позывному КАЧ передаёт привет вам товарищи! Служили вместе 100 лет назад. У него всё на 4, не хватает дрона и дронобойки. Теплак, говорит, затрофеил.
🤙 Предлагаю скинуться боевому муравью на нехватку экипировки, он реально выполняет боевые задачи (впрочем, как и все мои братулёчки). Всё, как обычно - кто сколько может. 😡Zлые Отважные Vоинственные
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from us
