Конституционный суд Казахстана посчитал соответствующей Конституции норму, которая запрещает условно-досрочное освобождение осужденным по тяжким и особо тяжким коррупционным статьям.
С обращением в Конституционный суд обращалась группа граждан, которая оспаривала законность нормы Уголовно-исполнительного кодекса.
По мнению обратившихся в суд, оспариваемая норма противоречит Конституции, поскольку ухудшает их положение, несмотря на то, что преступления были совершены до введения ограничения применения УДО за тяжкое и особо тяжкое коррупционное преступление.
Конституционный суд Казахстана посчитал соответствующей Конституции норму, которая запрещает условно-досрочное освобождение осужденным по тяжким и особо тяжким коррупционным статьям.
С обращением в Конституционный суд обращалась группа граждан, которая оспаривала законность нормы Уголовно-исполнительного кодекса.
По мнению обратившихся в суд, оспариваемая норма противоречит Конституции, поскольку ухудшает их положение, несмотря на то, что преступления были совершены до введения ограничения применения УДО за тяжкое и особо тяжкое коррупционное преступление.
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from us
