Neutralitätsgebots-Ignoranz und Parteienfilz in Velten
Robert Wolinski ist seit zehn Jahren fraktionsloser Stadtverordneter für „Die Heimat“ vormals NPD in Velten. In den vergangenen Monaten fiel er in den Stadtverordnetenversammlungen durch hartnäckige Anfragen an die Verwaltung zum Thema Neutralitätspflicht und Parteienfilz auf. Gabriele Schade befragte ihn ein paar Tage vor den am 09. Juni 2024 stattgefundenen Wahlen im nachfolgendem Interview zu diesen und anderen Themen.
Neutralitätsgebots-Ignoranz und Parteienfilz in Velten
Robert Wolinski ist seit zehn Jahren fraktionsloser Stadtverordneter für „Die Heimat“ vormals NPD in Velten. In den vergangenen Monaten fiel er in den Stadtverordnetenversammlungen durch hartnäckige Anfragen an die Verwaltung zum Thema Neutralitätspflicht und Parteienfilz auf. Gabriele Schade befragte ihn ein paar Tage vor den am 09. Juni 2024 stattgefundenen Wahlen im nachfolgendem Interview zu diesen und anderen Themen.
He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Sebi said data, emails and other documents are being retrieved from the seized devices and detailed investigation is in progress. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from vn
