اینو در انقلاب ۵۷ به روشنی می‌شه دید : جامعه ( اهل و عیال شاه فقید ) به سرعتی که ظرفیت و بلوغ‌ش رو نداشت پیشرفت کرد و حس کرد ارزش جفتی‌ش رفته بالا ، ازون ور حس کرد بخاطر فشار کارتر برای حقوق بشر ، خیانت هزینه بالایی نداره ، لذا تن به مرد جدید داد ، مرد نمایشی بی عرضه رو وانهاد و چسبید به مرد خودشیفته ضد اجتماعی ِ اهل خدعَه که بهش وعده‌ی زندگی بی همتا داد ... )
اینو در انقلاب ۵۷ به روشنی می‌شه دید : جامعه ( اهل و عیال شاه فقید ) به سرعتی که ظرفیت و بلوغ‌ش رو نداشت پیشرفت کرد و حس کرد ارزش جفتی‌ش رفته بالا ، ازون ور حس کرد بخاطر فشار کارتر برای حقوق بشر ، خیانت هزینه بالایی نداره ، لذا تن به مرد جدید داد ، مرد نمایشی بی عرضه رو وانهاد و چسبید به مرد خودشیفته ضد اجتماعی ِ اهل خدعَه که بهش وعده‌ی زندگی بی همتا داد ... )
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Russian President Vladimir Putin launched Russia's invasion of Ukraine in the early-morning hours of February 24, targeting several key cities with military strikes. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts.
from vn
