🔸با حضور: امانوئل اسکوفیاس اقتصاددان برجسته در بانک جهانی استاد مهمان مدرسه خط مشی لی کوان یو، دانشگاه ملی سنگاپور دانش آموخته رشته اقتصاد از دانشگاه های مینه سوتا و برکلی
محورهای گفتگو: 🔅چگونه یک برنامه کاهش فقر اثربخش طراحی می‌شود؟ 🔅آیا آزمایش‌های کنترل‌شده تصادفی (RCT) پاسخ نهایی ما به مسئله فقر است؟ 🔅چگونه استفاده از یارانه‌های نقدی را در کاهش فقر مؤثرتر کنیم؟
🕓 دوشنبه 17 اردیبهشت ماه ۱۴۰۳ ساعت 14:30 الی 16:00
🔸با حضور: امانوئل اسکوفیاس اقتصاددان برجسته در بانک جهانی استاد مهمان مدرسه خط مشی لی کوان یو، دانشگاه ملی سنگاپور دانش آموخته رشته اقتصاد از دانشگاه های مینه سوتا و برکلی
محورهای گفتگو: 🔅چگونه یک برنامه کاهش فقر اثربخش طراحی می‌شود؟ 🔅آیا آزمایش‌های کنترل‌شده تصادفی (RCT) پاسخ نهایی ما به مسئله فقر است؟ 🔅چگونه استفاده از یارانه‌های نقدی را در کاهش فقر مؤثرتر کنیم؟
🕓 دوشنبه 17 اردیبهشت ماه ۱۴۰۳ ساعت 14:30 الی 16:00
Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Also in the latest update is the ability for users to create a unique @username from the Settings page, providing others with an easy way to contact them via Search or their t.me/username link without sharing their phone number. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from vn
