I want to understand something important. You believe that denying Joseph Smith's miracles is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit because they came from God's power. Yet Joseph Smith used the very same seer stone he later used for translation for treasure hunting. He admitted in court to using it to defraud people before claiming it was a divine gift. So, we have three possibilities.
1. All the power was from God even when Joseph confessed using such to defraud people. 2. It was always the power of something else, or 3. The same identical practice somehow changed sources from fraudulent to divine
Which of these makes the most sense to you? And how do you determine when the same practice went from being fraudulent to divine?
I want to understand something important. You believe that denying Joseph Smith's miracles is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit because they came from God's power. Yet Joseph Smith used the very same seer stone he later used for translation for treasure hunting. He admitted in court to using it to defraud people before claiming it was a divine gift. So, we have three possibilities.
1. All the power was from God even when Joseph confessed using such to defraud people. 2. It was always the power of something else, or 3. The same identical practice somehow changed sources from fraudulent to divine
Which of these makes the most sense to you? And how do you determine when the same practice went from being fraudulent to divine?
BY Ketching up with Dr Bob
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK.
from vn
