🗣️Пошли слухи, что на прошлой неделе состоялась встреча между чиновниками Байдена и главами крупнейших нефтяных компаний: администрация Белого дома в "ужасе" от перспективы 5$ за галлон бензина в США.
В ответ на мольбу об увеличении производства, один из CEO высказался: «Либо вы лгали нам 2 года назад, либо лжете сейчас. Определились бы уже.»
🗣️Пошли слухи, что на прошлой неделе состоялась встреча между чиновниками Байдена и главами крупнейших нефтяных компаний: администрация Белого дома в "ужасе" от перспективы 5$ за галлон бензина в США.
В ответ на мольбу об увеличении производства, один из CEO высказался: «Либо вы лгали нам 2 года назад, либо лжете сейчас. Определились бы уже.»
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said.
from vn
