Bir darveshga "Xayrli Jumalar" deyishibdi. U esa "Juma shundoq ham xayrli" debdi. Keyin "Juma muborak" deyishibdi. U esa "Juma shundoq ham muborak kun" debdi. Unda nima deylik, sen ayt deb so‘rashibdi. U "Jumaning xayri va barokati senga bo‘lsin" deng, degan ekan.
Bir darveshga "Xayrli Jumalar" deyishibdi. U esa "Juma shundoq ham xayrli" debdi. Keyin "Juma muborak" deyishibdi. U esa "Juma shundoq ham muborak kun" debdi. Unda nima deylik, sen ayt deb so‘rashibdi. U "Jumaning xayri va barokati senga bo‘lsin" deng, degan ekan.
Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from vn
