Отличный пример от друзей! Надо бы еще подумать над аналогом глобуса, на котором будут только Россия и Беларусь, над аналогом Айфона, который будет звонить только в ФСБ и КГБ, да и в принципе над аналогом интернета, в котором будет доступ только к Госуслугам и сайтам президентов обеих стран
Отличный пример от друзей! Надо бы еще подумать над аналогом глобуса, на котором будут только Россия и Беларусь, над аналогом Айфона, который будет звонить только в ФСБ и КГБ, да и в принципе над аналогом интернета, в котором будет доступ только к Госуслугам и сайтам президентов обеих стран
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from vn
