Ну вот и решение Белого дома, которое явно ожидало выборов
NYT: согласно решению Байдена, ВСУ теперь могут наносить удары вглубь территории РФ американскими дальнобойными ракетами ATACMS. Байден разрешил ВСУ использовать недальнобойные ракеты ATACMS дальностью 50 миль на территории Курской области. Об этом пишет New York Times со ссылкой на американских чиновников.
Ну вот и решение Белого дома, которое явно ожидало выборов
NYT: согласно решению Байдена, ВСУ теперь могут наносить удары вглубь территории РФ американскими дальнобойными ракетами ATACMS. Байден разрешил ВСУ использовать недальнобойные ракеты ATACMS дальностью 50 миль на территории Курской области. Об этом пишет New York Times со ссылкой на американских чиновников.
BY Украина не Россия❓
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from vn
