Сегодня часовая тренировка с Машей на осанку, руки, плечи, бассейн и завтрак с салапао и огромным стаканом ледяного кофе! Кайф!
Специально для бассейна заказала слитный купальник, не ожидала, что за 700 руб (сейчас вообще 587 руб) он окажется таким классным! Простой, удобный, соответствует размерной сетке, нигде не жмёт и никуда не впивается.
Сегодня часовая тренировка с Машей на осанку, руки, плечи, бассейн и завтрак с салапао и огромным стаканом ледяного кофе! Кайф!
Специально для бассейна заказала слитный купальник, не ожидала, что за 700 руб (сейчас вообще 587 руб) он окажется таким классным! Простой, удобный, соответствует размерной сетке, нигде не жмёт и никуда не впивается.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. However, the perpetrators of such frauds are now adopting new methods and technologies to defraud the investors. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children.
from vn
