Знакомый вектор у этой инициативы: государство стремится минимизировать потери бюджета из-за незаконных схем, связанных с уклонением от уплаты налогов. Увеличение контроля над регистрацией ИП может способствовать сокращению налоговых лазеек и увеличению сборов.
Знакомый вектор у этой инициативы: государство стремится минимизировать потери бюджета из-за незаконных схем, связанных с уклонением от уплаты налогов. Увеличение контроля над регистрацией ИП может способствовать сокращению налоговых лазеек и увеличению сборов.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said.
from vn
