Иллюстрация: Иоахим Хассельгрен (1735-после 1796). Стеклянный бокал для шампанского на ножке, оправленный в золото, с крышкой. 1768. Россия. Стекло, золото; чеканка, полировка, гравировка. Государственный Эрмитаж.
Иллюстрация: Иоахим Хассельгрен (1735-после 1796). Стеклянный бокал для шампанского на ножке, оправленный в золото, с крышкой. 1768. Россия. Стекло, золото; чеканка, полировка, гравировка. Государственный Эрмитаж.
One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." "The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred."
from vn
