...когда я спозаранку шел на работу, все было мне до того противно и скучно, что я, хоть даже и не особенно опаздывал, вдруг припустил бегом — ни с какой иной целью, кроме как немного встряхнуть отвратительность окружающего мира и сделать ее хоть чуточку выносимее.
...когда я спозаранку шел на работу, все было мне до того противно и скучно, что я, хоть даже и не особенно опаздывал, вдруг припустил бегом — ни с какой иной целью, кроме как немного встряхнуть отвратительность окружающего мира и сделать ее хоть чуточку выносимее.
Письма Фелиции, 21.02.1913, 29 лет
BY Книгижарь
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from vn
