Бликует как тварь, снимается как синий блин. На деле она чуть холоднее и вообще не кислотная, с приятно светящейся водой и жемчужным небом. Штош. Замок на берегу моря, конечно же, продается.Предварительно занят. Реально большой- 60х50 см, масло/холст.
Бликует как тварь, снимается как синий блин. На деле она чуть холоднее и вообще не кислотная, с приятно светящейся водой и жемчужным небом. Штош. Замок на берегу моря, конечно же, продается.Предварительно занят. Реально большой- 60х50 см, масло/холст.
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from vn