Слушать можно даже не читавшим. Роман таков, что его не заспойлерить. Да и обсудили мы его по касательной😆 Больше говорим о финнах, переводческих делах и премии «Ясная Поляна». Так бывает.
Все вышеперечисленное обсуждаем с Вероникой Силивановой, которая к премии, «Тысяче чертей» и даже финнам имеет самое непосредственное отношение. Короче, настоящий эксклюзив.
Слушать можно даже не читавшим. Роман таков, что его не заспойлерить. Да и обсудили мы его по касательной😆 Больше говорим о финнах, переводческих делах и премии «Ясная Поляна». Так бывает.
Все вышеперечисленное обсуждаем с Вероникой Силивановой, которая к премии, «Тысяче чертей» и даже финнам имеет самое непосредственное отношение. Короче, настоящий эксклюзив.
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp.
from vn
