Видео, в полной мере передающее атмосферу каждодневной работы штурмовиков гвардейской 144 мотострелковой дивизии.
Юго-восточная окраина н.п. Терны. Тройка наших стальных штурмов подходит к опорнику хохла. Начинается стрелковый бой. С воздуха гвардейцев прикрывают сбросники и ФПВ-дроны. Передвигаясь ползком и перекатами, штурмовики врываются на опорник и уничтожают обороняющихся ВСУшников. Закидав блиндажи гранатами, наши воины уничтожают оставшихся на опорнике хохлов, полностью устанавливая над ним свой контроль.
Видео, в полной мере передающее атмосферу каждодневной работы штурмовиков гвардейской 144 мотострелковой дивизии.
Юго-восточная окраина н.п. Терны. Тройка наших стальных штурмов подходит к опорнику хохла. Начинается стрелковый бой. С воздуха гвардейцев прикрывают сбросники и ФПВ-дроны. Передвигаясь ползком и перекатами, штурмовики врываются на опорник и уничтожают обороняющихся ВСУшников. Закидав блиндажи гранатами, наши воины уничтожают оставшихся на опорнике хохлов, полностью устанавливая над ним свой контроль.
BY Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said.
from vn
