ليبكِ الرجال حتى تنتقع لحاياهم بدموعهم ليجلسوا على التراب ويلطموا صدورهم ورؤوسهم حتى يستوعبوا الخسارة التي ألمّت بهم
وبعدها ليمسحوا دموعهم .. ويقوموا بالله واثقين ويثبتوا ثباتا لا تزحزحه الوقائع ولا تزلزله الخلائق .. ويسيروا في طريق الجهاد سير من ليس لديه شيء يخسره أو يخاف عليه ..
ليبكِ الرجال حتى تنتقع لحاياهم بدموعهم ليجلسوا على التراب ويلطموا صدورهم ورؤوسهم حتى يستوعبوا الخسارة التي ألمّت بهم
وبعدها ليمسحوا دموعهم .. ويقوموا بالله واثقين ويثبتوا ثباتا لا تزحزحه الوقائع ولا تزلزله الخلائق .. ويسيروا في طريق الجهاد سير من ليس لديه شيء يخسره أو يخاف عليه ..
BY { ❤️🕌آلُمنآسبآتٌ آلُۆلُآئيَہ🕌❤️ }
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from vn
