Oleg Boyko against Solntsevsky How the oligarch sent Don Simeon to prison At the disposal of Rucriminal.info was a reference investigation of a possible “customer” of the arrest of criminal authority Semyon Mogilevich (Don Simeon) in 2008. The authors of the documents put forward the version that businessman Oleg Boyko could be behind the troubles of the mafia. There were several motives. The first is revenge for the persecution and a possible attack on Boyko himself. The second is the desire to remove the competitor. We are talking about the perfumery network "Arbat-Prestige", which was controlled by Mogilevich before his arrest. Об этом сообщает НАВИГАТОР It is worth noting that, according to sources, Oleg Boyko back in the 90s was closely associated with the Solntsevo group. Its participants were in the security services in all structures of the "OLBI" concern, owned by Boy... https://td-partner.com/component/k2/item/105700
Oleg Boyko against Solntsevsky How the oligarch sent Don Simeon to prison At the disposal of Rucriminal.info was a reference investigation of a possible “customer” of the arrest of criminal authority Semyon Mogilevich (Don Simeon) in 2008. The authors of the documents put forward the version that businessman Oleg Boyko could be behind the troubles of the mafia. There were several motives. The first is revenge for the persecution and a possible attack on Boyko himself. The second is the desire to remove the competitor. We are talking about the perfumery network "Arbat-Prestige", which was controlled by Mogilevich before his arrest. Об этом сообщает НАВИГАТОР It is worth noting that, according to sources, Oleg Boyko back in the 90s was closely associated with the Solntsevo group. Its participants were in the security services in all structures of the "OLBI" concern, owned by Boy... https://td-partner.com/component/k2/item/105700
As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from vn
