Друзья, спешим поделиться, что наш сервис прошёл небольшое обновление! Мы не только обновили наш лендинг, но и провели небольшой ребрендинг. Теперь наш сайт выглядит ярче и современнее благодаря новым цветам.
✔️Что нового? — Цвета: Мы выбрали палитру, которая отражает нашу энергетику и стремление к инновациям. — Шрифты: Легкость восприятия информации - наша приоритетная задача. — Маскот: Наш новый фирменный персонаж со своим характером и настроением.
🖥Что это значит для вас? Мы постепенно будем рассказывать обо всех обновлениях и преимуществах, которые вас ждут. Это не просто косметические изменения, а шаг к улучшению вашего опыта с @FleepBot!
Друзья, спешим поделиться, что наш сервис прошёл небольшое обновление! Мы не только обновили наш лендинг, но и провели небольшой ребрендинг. Теперь наш сайт выглядит ярче и современнее благодаря новым цветам.
✔️Что нового? — Цвета: Мы выбрали палитру, которая отражает нашу энергетику и стремление к инновациям. — Шрифты: Легкость восприятия информации - наша приоритетная задача. — Маскот: Наш новый фирменный персонаж со своим характером и настроением.
🖥Что это значит для вас? Мы постепенно будем рассказывать обо всех обновлениях и преимуществах, которые вас ждут. Это не просто косметические изменения, а шаг к улучшению вашего опыта с @FleepBot!
Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from vn
