🐕 Пушистый спецотряд: в МЧС служат более 300 котов и собак.
На службе у ведомства есть даже белки, рыбки и черепахи. Животные выполняют важную задачу — дарят тепло и поддержку, помогают своим присутствием спасателям и пожарным после тяжёлых выездов.
❤️, чтобы четвероногие и дальше продолжали заниматься такой важной работой
🐕 Пушистый спецотряд: в МЧС служат более 300 котов и собак.
На службе у ведомства есть даже белки, рыбки и черепахи. Животные выполняют важную задачу — дарят тепло и поддержку, помогают своим присутствием спасателям и пожарным после тяжёлых выездов.
❤️, чтобы четвероногие и дальше продолжали заниматься такой важной работой
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from vn
