Странная какая-то история с режимом повышенной готовности 2.0... вот коллеги утверждают, что после нагоняя губернатора, в городе повторно его ввели... Но нигде этого документа нет... Странная ситуация?!! Может мэрия ввела РПГ только для списания средств и проведения работ без торгов?!! Или для того, чтобы защитить Салмина от гипотетического пинка под зад?!! Тогда прокуратура должна срочно заняться этим... Если у кого есть ссылка на официальный документ, скиньте плиииз в чат...
Странная какая-то история с режимом повышенной готовности 2.0... вот коллеги утверждают, что после нагоняя губернатора, в городе повторно его ввели... Но нигде этого документа нет... Странная ситуация?!! Может мэрия ввела РПГ только для списания средств и проведения работ без торгов?!! Или для того, чтобы защитить Салмина от гипотетического пинка под зад?!! Тогда прокуратура должна срочно заняться этим... Если у кого есть ссылка на официальный документ, скиньте плиииз в чат...
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change.
from vn
