«بدبختانه ما نه تمدن ظاهری فرنگستان را گرفتیم نه تمدن معنوی آن را، از تمدن ظاهری جز فحشا و قمار و لباس میمون صفت و خودآرایی با وسایل وارده از خارج و از تمدن باطنی آن‌ها نیز چیز نیاموختیم جز آنکه انکار ادیان را بدون ایمان به یک اصل و یک عقیده معنوی، [که] فرنگی مآبان ما آموختند.»
«بدبختانه ما نه تمدن ظاهری فرنگستان را گرفتیم نه تمدن معنوی آن را، از تمدن ظاهری جز فحشا و قمار و لباس میمون صفت و خودآرایی با وسایل وارده از خارج و از تمدن باطنی آن‌ها نیز چیز نیاموختیم جز آنکه انکار ادیان را بدون ایمان به یک اصل و یک عقیده معنوی، [که] فرنگی مآبان ما آموختند.»
"We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from vn
