Становится семейной традицией чуточку сокращать московскую зиму, и уже второй из трех раз встречать сам Новый год под пальмами) Надеюсь, вы нас не будете слишком ненавидеть ❤️
Мы, как обычно, не обошлись без приключений, на этот раз прямо на стойке регистрации 😐
Что ж, в добрый путь! Вам сердечко от Мирона 🫶🏻 Пожелайте мягкой посадки, друзья)
Становится семейной традицией чуточку сокращать московскую зиму, и уже второй из трех раз встречать сам Новый год под пальмами) Надеюсь, вы нас не будете слишком ненавидеть ❤️
Мы, как обычно, не обошлись без приключений, на этот раз прямо на стойке регистрации 😐
Что ж, в добрый путь! Вам сердечко от Мирона 🫶🏻 Пожелайте мягкой посадки, друзья)
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from vn
