"Хотелось бы вопрос задать, чисто из интереса, как русские националисты относятся к дагестанцам (естественно про нормальных, которые слабых ущемляют не наши) так как 9 героев России на Сво с русскими бок о бок, и такой вот вопрос"
Видео на Ютубе. 👈 Проставьте пальцы вверх этому видео в Ютубе пожалуйста.
"Хотелось бы вопрос задать, чисто из интереса, как русские националисты относятся к дагестанцам (естественно про нормальных, которые слабых ущемляют не наши) так как 9 героев России на Сво с русскими бок о бок, и такой вот вопрос"
Видео на Ютубе. 👈 Проставьте пальцы вверх этому видео в Ютубе пожалуйста.
BY Русский Националист
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. And indeed, volatility has been a hallmark of the market environment so far in 2022, with the S&P 500 still down more than 10% for the year-to-date after first sliding into a correction last month. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, has held at a lofty level of more than 30. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images
from vn
