Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8828 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Политфак на связи | Telegram Webview: politfack/326 -
Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Forwarded from Political Animals
Сейчас есть консенсус среди политологов, что весь мир усиленно автократизируется. Однако на фоне этой автократизации остается незамеченным ещё один факт: авторитарные режимы стали гораздо устойчивее, чем их предшественники.

Эрика Франц пишет, что в самый разгар холодной войны (с 1950-х по 1970-е) средняя выживаемость автократий достигала 5-15 лет. Да, их было гораздо больше, чем сейчас, но срок их существования был гораздо короче. Однако на сегодняшний день средний срок жизни диктатуры достиг показателя в размере 30 лет.

Что думаете? С чем это может быть связано?

Frantz, Erica. "Authoritarian survival." Research Handbook on Authoritarianism. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. 229-243.

А.Т.

#кратко

🔻Подпишись на Political Animals



group-telegram.com/politfack/326
Create:
Last Update:

Сейчас есть консенсус среди политологов, что весь мир усиленно автократизируется. Однако на фоне этой автократизации остается незамеченным ещё один факт: авторитарные режимы стали гораздо устойчивее, чем их предшественники.

Эрика Франц пишет, что в самый разгар холодной войны (с 1950-х по 1970-е) средняя выживаемость автократий достигала 5-15 лет. Да, их было гораздо больше, чем сейчас, но срок их существования был гораздо короче. Однако на сегодняшний день средний срок жизни диктатуры достиг показателя в размере 30 лет.

Что думаете? С чем это может быть связано?

Frantz, Erica. "Authoritarian survival." Research Handbook on Authoritarianism. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. 229-243.

А.Т.

#кратко

🔻Подпишись на Political Animals

BY Политфак на связи




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/politfack/326

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from vn


Telegram Политфак на связи
FROM American