около года назад, набрав почти 14 млн просмотров, в ТикТоке стало виральным видео: "would you rather be stuck in a forest with a man or a with a bear?", где только одна из восьми респонденток выбрала встречу с мужчиной
комментарии, как говорится, speak volumes (говорят сами за себя):
1. A bear wouldn’t attack me and then tell his friends that I liked it. 2. With a bear the only fear is death. 3. No one’s gonna ask me if I led the bear on or give me a pamphlet on "bear attack prevention tips". 4. A bear - people would believe me if I said a bear attacked me. 5. A bear. And IF (!) I get attacked, people wouldn't question me what I was wearing. 6. Bears won’t chain me up in a basement for 20 years. 7. No one is going to blame my skirt if a bear attacks me. 8. The bear lives there. The man probably followed me.
PS: нет, я не слушала ТОТ подкаст; я закончила пересматривать "Тринадцать причин почему"
около года назад, набрав почти 14 млн просмотров, в ТикТоке стало виральным видео: "would you rather be stuck in a forest with a man or a with a bear?", где только одна из восьми респонденток выбрала встречу с мужчиной
комментарии, как говорится, speak volumes (говорят сами за себя):
1. A bear wouldn’t attack me and then tell his friends that I liked it. 2. With a bear the only fear is death. 3. No one’s gonna ask me if I led the bear on or give me a pamphlet on "bear attack prevention tips". 4. A bear - people would believe me if I said a bear attacked me. 5. A bear. And IF (!) I get attacked, people wouldn't question me what I was wearing. 6. Bears won’t chain me up in a basement for 20 years. 7. No one is going to blame my skirt if a bear attacks me. 8. The bear lives there. The man probably followed me.
PS: нет, я не слушала ТОТ подкаст; я закончила пересматривать "Тринадцать причин почему"
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from vn
