Цієї суботи буде відкритий мікрофон у Melancholic Espresso Bar. Сподіваюся, що одужаю і знову зможу прийти у це чудове місце. Також там проводяться чайні церемонії, концерти, літературні вечори та стендапи, тож, сподіваюся, одного разу вас там зустріти 😌🖤☕️ https://www.instagram.com/melancholic_espresso_bar?igsh=M2l1enhvYXlkN3p0
Цієї суботи буде відкритий мікрофон у Melancholic Espresso Bar. Сподіваюся, що одужаю і знову зможу прийти у це чудове місце. Також там проводяться чайні церемонії, концерти, літературні вечори та стендапи, тож, сподіваюся, одного разу вас там зустріти 😌🖤☕️ https://www.instagram.com/melancholic_espresso_bar?igsh=M2l1enhvYXlkN3p0
BY Qualia Essence #УкрТґ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from vn
