َخـذٍ لـٍـًـك كـٍـٍـًل يـٍومٌ حًـكـٍمٌهـﮩًـٍ

َخـذٍ لـٍـًـك كـٍـٍـًل يـٍومٌ حًـكـٍمٌهـﮩًـٍ

َخـذٍ لـٍـًـك كـٍـٍـًل يـٍومٌ حًـكـٍمٌهـﮩًـٍ Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
َخـذٍ لـٍـًـك كـٍـٍـًل يـٍومٌ حًـكـٍمٌهـﮩًـٍ from vn

َخـذٍ لـٍـًـك كـٍـٍـًل يـٍومٌ حًـكـٍمٌهـﮩًـٍنعطيكم كل يوم قصه لتاخذ العظه والهبره ونرتقي معا نحو العلا

Open Telegram