🏛Приглашаем вNonΦλαττόθρατ– канал-книгохранилище о греко-латинской культуре, главным образом, словесности.
Здесь вы найдёте подборки трудов известных филологов-классиков, патрологов, медиевистов, исследований по различным темам, изданий на языке оригинала и переводов.
На канале уже есть более 760 книг на русском, латинском, греческом, английском, немецком, итальянском, французском языках 📕
🏛Приглашаем вNonΦλαττόθρατ– канал-книгохранилище о греко-латинской культуре, главным образом, словесности.
Здесь вы найдёте подборки трудов известных филологов-классиков, патрологов, медиевистов, исследований по различным темам, изданий на языке оригинала и переводов.
На канале уже есть более 760 книг на русском, латинском, греческом, английском, немецком, итальянском, французском языках 📕
"Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from vn
