🤡Послушайте, что говорят беглые. «Политвязни» – это все не важно.
Войну с «рэжымом» они ведут не для их освобождения. Они оказались в тюрьме для того, чтобы достичь «перамоги». А освобождение из тюрьмы – это проигрыш.
Змагар, как там твоя «барацьба»?
Сами ответили на вопрос, почему они т.н. «политзаключенным» даже писем не писали, не говоря уже о какой-то помощи из лохофондов Стрижака.
🤡Послушайте, что говорят беглые. «Политвязни» – это все не важно.
Войну с «рэжымом» они ведут не для их освобождения. Они оказались в тюрьме для того, чтобы достичь «перамоги». А освобождение из тюрьмы – это проигрыш.
Змагар, как там твоя «барацьба»?
Сами ответили на вопрос, почему они т.н. «политзаключенным» даже писем не писали, не говоря уже о какой-то помощи из лохофондов Стрижака.
In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from vn
